0
Link to Homelink to Personal Serivceslink to Services for Organizationslink to About Uslink to Shopping Cart
Fascinating Information top menu category header
Frequently Asked Questions
 

How Does Handwriting Analysis Work? >>
What can't handwriting analysis reveal? >>
What does my signature show the handwriting analyst? >>
What Kind of Proof is there for Handwriting Analysis? >>
Is it Legal to Have Another Person's Handwriting Analyzed Without Their Consent? >>
How do I purchase a Handwriting Analysis? >>

HOW DOES HANDWRITING ANALYSIS WORK?

Handwriting is a snapshot of the brain's inner thinking at the time the writing was written. It is nothing more than that. However, since people do not change their personality from minute to minute (unless they have multiple personalities), handwriting analysis has a broader application. But people should always bear in mind a snap shot is just that: a frozen frame in the passing of time. If a person is drunk or depressed when the writing sample was made, of course it will look different than when the person isn't.

People are not generally aware that the brain must coordinate about 200 muscles for the body to produce handwriting. The mind is busy making hundreds of decisions per minute when handwriting occurs. What the analyst is doing is working backwards. Why did the mind make that decision? Why did the mind start the address on the envelope in the lower right corner? Why did the mind choose to use enormous pressure, and enormous speed when manipulating the pen? Handwriting analysis works because a person can only consciously change a small number of the decisions that the mind has to make in writing. In other words, he can alter his or her handwriting somewhat, but it is very difficult to completely change all the decisions the mind habitually makes when it writes.

People will blame the way they write on their teachers, a friend they admire, or some other scapegoat. The truth is that we make the choice ourselves as to how we write. For over hundreds of years, people have discovered the common "reasons" (or more precisely "meanings to") why the mind makes certain decisions. For instance, a fluid "g" means the person has literary interest. This is the meaning - but what I have sought to do was to explain the workings of how and why the brain's choices reflect that trait. At one time I wanted to write a detailed book explaining why a certain handwriting decision reflects the meaning that analysts give to it (Time has not yet permitted the writing this book!), as there is yet no comprehensive work on this subject.

It is rare for two people to think exactly alike. This is why handwriting, which is 'brain-writing', creates nearly unique handwriting. It is this near uniqueness of handwriting that allows the science of disputed documents to determine handwriting forgeries. While the disputed document examiner will note the way strokes are made or not made, the reason for these differences between the real and the forgery go back to the reality that handwriting requires hundreds of unconscious decisions every minute in order to happen. Top

WHAT CAN'T HANDWRITING ANALYSIS REVEAL?

What can't handwriting analysis reveal? At times the Graphologist may be confronted with a sample from someone, who without saying what their job is, will ask, "Should I change my job?" Handwriting analysis can not show a person's actual employment. It is not an occult art or a game, and questions like this sometimes arise because people don't understand how handwriting analysis works. It also will not tell us the sex and age of the writer, even though it may provide clues as to what these are.

The limitations of what can be accurately determined also depends upon the quality of samples used, and the training and techniques of the handwriting analyst. There are a number of extremely interesting things that the handwriting may reveal including medical situations and states of mind (drug or alcohol states, etc.), and compatibility with other personalities. The handwriting technically cannot predict the future. While many people, perhaps even most analysts, improperly and inaccurately say that it can predict the future, a more accurate statement would be as follows:

Handwriting is a snapshot of the mental processes of a person the instant the handwriting was performed. Because people seldom change from day to day, and tend to be consistent, it is reasonable to expect that the mental processes will likely be the same in the near future. However, the modern world has many multiple personalties, mind-altering drugs, and life changing traumas that can destroy the predictive ability of an analysis. Therefore it is most accurate to state, handwriting can not predict the future, but it can give us important information in dealing with the future. Top

WHAT DOES MY SIGNATURE SHOW THE HANDWRITING ANALYST?

Signatures are a special kind of stroke. Just as doodles can be analyzed, but must be given special consideration, so must signatures. If the handwriting analyst is a Disputed Documents Examiner, the examiner will be looking at the numerous features of the handwriting to determine authenticity. The very same reasons that the Disputed Documents Examiner can successfully identify a person's handwriting as a legitimate signature are the same reasons that information can be gleaned to analyze the writer's character.

The choices in how the signature is formed are reflections of the person's mental processes, and a forger can only consciously alter a limited number of these choices. However, for determining a person's personality, signatures are not to be treated the same way as the rest of the writing. The same principles of analysis are used; but the analyst must also be aware of several things that contrast signatures from the person's handwriting. A person's signature may vary from situation to situation (a person may have many faces to show the world), and may be quite different from his or her everyday handwriting. And in fact, the signature may not even represent letters but may be some kind of unrecognizable personal cipher simply to be recognized as a design. Obviously any handwriting that is deliberately unreadable means the writer doesn't wish to communicate for whatever reason. The answer to the question is this then, signatures can be analyzed if they are analyzed as signatures. Top

WHAT KIND OF PROOF IS THERE FOR HANDWRITING ANALYSIS?

Actually there is a great deal of proof for handwriting analysis. The best centers for research into graphology have been in northern Europe, and the center for Graphoanalysis is in Chicago. Speaking with a handwriting analyst is not the best way to find statistics on the efficacy of handwriting analysis, because most handwriting analysts are involved with handwriting in order to perform analyses, and are not involved in research. You would not expect a fireman to know everything there is to know about firefighting, and the scientific research papers documenting that firefighting works. He is concerned with applying what he knows in a practical manner, and he knows it works because he puts out fires. Most analysts know handwriting works because it validates itself everyday for them. If you have been doing handwriting analysis for 30 years, as I have, you know how it works. And just like fighting a fire, sometimes circumstances prevent the techniques from totally working, but not because the techniques are not viable correct responses, but in some cases, the analyst doesn't have enough material to analyze.

Clearly, this web site is not the place for a comprehensive overview of handwriting research. One word of caution: American psychologists in general (in contrast with European and Israeli psychologists) have pooh-poohed the entire idea of handwriting analysis. Just like the AMA has refused to grant alternative inexpensive treatments their rightful place, but laud expensive drugs and surgery; likewise psychologists are not going to give room for a technique, which works better than all their complicated theories. At times, these narrow-minded, little-minded professionals have used their own questionable techniques such as Freud's psychoanalysis as a ruler with which to gauge the accuracy of handwriting analysis. This is like using a warped yardstick to gauge the accuracy of a micrometer - it is valueless. And this is the problem with studying human personality. The methods of measuring are still primitive and varied.

Let's briefly touch on how primitive and varied current measuring devices are. We have projective techniques like Rorschach (which has received criticism), and tests such as the MMPI (which are meant to be objective, but have been misused). It has only been recently, that a category of Highly Sensitive People has been properly identified. Gittinger of the CIA created an effective gauge for measuring personality for the secret societies, but he was the one who understood it best, and his ideas haven't gained much attention. These things are mentioned just to open up the reader to the fact that psychology and character analysis are relatively new studies, and still have a ways to go.

It is time to overhaul our methods for evaluating people. Only by a complete overhaul of how people are assessed are we going to develop better gauges to evaluate the amazing value and success of handwriting analysis. However, many of the people who spend their time analyzing people are wedded to their primitive techniques and are not about to admit the limitations of the labels they are slapping onto people. Top

IS IT LEGAL TO HAVE ANOTHER PERSON'S HANDWRITING ANALYZED WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT?

Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court has twice ruled that a person's handwriting may be analyzed by anyone without his or her consent:

1. In United States V. Mara, 410 U.S. 19, 41 IW 4185 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated by a compelled production of "physical characteristics" that are constantly exposed to the public. The court stated:

Handwriting, like speech, is repeatedly shown to the public and there is no more expectation of privacy in the physical characteristics of a person's script than there is in the tone of his voice.

2. In United States v. Dionision, 410 U.S. 1, 41 IW 4180 (1973), the Supreme Court held that the physical characteristics of a person's voice or handwriting or facial characteristics, being constantly exposed to the public view, are not within protection of the Fourth Amendment. Top

HOW DO I PURCHASE A HANDWRITING ANALYSIS?

To find out how to purchase a Handwriting Analysis, click the "Shopping Cart" link on the green border to the left of this paragraph. Top

 
 
Fascinating Information side menu category header
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 

  0